OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
175942186 3 days ago

Hello! Thank you for contributing! It looks like the tags for the street were slightly incorrect, I've went ahead and fixed it and added the gate to the road
Thank you!

175614191 11 days ago

be careful not to use data from other sources! they have to have compatible licensing, copying something from google maps/google streetview is prohibited.
heres a little tip, you may use bing streetside which is built right into ID editor! hit "u" (or select map data button on the right while editing) go to photo overlays and select bing streetside or mapillary!

175568804 12 days ago

Hello and welcome! try to briefly describe what you are updating in the change-set comment something like "added address tags"

175465275 14 days ago

I have changed the way to a drive way rather than a residential road, thank you for improving the map!

171602226 3 months ago

hi there! its good practice to leave changeset comments so its more clear to other local editors what is changing. it can be simple like
*added bicycle parking* ,
*added benches* ,
etc.

Happy mapping!
-Fen

170423113 4 months ago

I reverted the deletion, no worries, the park looks great! awesome work!

170423113 4 months ago

can I ask why you deleted the pet waste bag dispenser I added 3 days ago with ground truth in this changeset? (node id 13068055554)

169428582 5 months ago

Thanks for fixing it! I must have been tired or something and put it in the wrong field in the address preset in JOSM. Have a good day!

168542042 5 months ago

whoops! looks like you may have added marked the service road as a gate, which is a tag which is most commonly applied to a node, I've have changed it back to a service road, the lift gate node placement and tagging is good though! thanks for contributing!

164735817 8 months ago

Right! Omg I had no idea either! Had to do some digging around on the wiki to find the right tag : )

158190248 about 1 year ago

Hi Glassman!
I am new to this and I have a question! The address tag currently lists "119;315" should the 315 be removed? if not, what is its purpose?
Thanks and have a wonderful day!
happy mapping - Fen